ad info

 
CNN.com  law center > news
trials and cases
open forum
law library
 
Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
LAW
TOP STORIES

Prosecutor says witnesses saw rap star shoot gun in club

Embassy bombing defendants' confessions admissible, says U.S. Judge

Excerpt: John Grisham's 'A Painted House'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's GO.com is a goner

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image

find law dictionary
 
from:
Time.com

Why jilted grannies got no help from the courts

June 5, 2000
Web posted at: 6:05 PM EDT (2205 GMT)

More From FindLaw
 
 
Court opinions:
Party name:

Full-text:
-----------

(TIME.com) -- From now on, if you want to see your grandkids in Seattle, ask their parents, not the courts. The conservative-dominated Supreme Court settled a question of what rights grandparents have in true conservative fashion Monday by ruling that, in short, they don't have any -- unless the parents say so. In a decision that was applauded by such strange bedfellows as Christian conservatives and gay-rights groups, six of the nine Supremos struck down a Washington law that went far beyond other states in granting grandparents, or anyone else, the legal right to ask the courts to mandate visitation of the kiddies in question. No dice, says TIME legal writer Adam Cohen. "The Justices were reluctant to have the courts impose limitations on how parents raise their children." The court's three dissenters, all grandparents themselves, countered, essentially, with "What could it hurt to ask?" But the majority was firm in drawing a line in the sand of parental autonomy: Unless parents are abusing the child, they have the final say.

*  RELATEDTime.com
High Court Takes on a Family Affair
 

Religious righties call that preservation of the American family; gay and lesbian groups figure the ruling cuts the opportunity for outside meddling in less traditional family units. The AARP had fought for the Washington law on the grounds that in an age of broken homes and increasingly twisted family trees, grandparents can be stabilizing forces in a child's life -- even if it means suing the tyke's mom (or dad) to get in the door. All hope is not lost for the gray brigade, however: The Washington law allowed "any person" to sue for visitation, and was rejected by the Court in part because it was "breathtakingly broad." The seniors will now certainly turn their attention to getting some grandparent-specific legislation moving through the pipeline, and perhaps back to the high court, before little Nicky gets too big to spoil. Until then, free advice for grandmas and grandpas: Be nice to your son- or daughter-in-law, because there's still a few matters the long arm of the law would rather not have a hand in.

Copyright © 2000 Time Inc.


 Search


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.