Skip to main content
ad info

 
CNN.com  law center > news
trials and cases
open forum
law library
 
Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
LAW
TOP STORIES

Prosecutor says witnesses saw rap star shoot gun in club

Embassy bombing defendants' confessions admissible, says U.S. Judge

Excerpt: John Grisham's 'A Painted House'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's GO.com is a goner

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image

find law dictionary
 

Judge rules no conflict of interest for attorney in LAPD police misconduct case

June 8, 2000
Web posted at: 1:41 p.m. EDT (1741 GMT)

graphic

LOS ANGELES (CNN) -- A lawyer defending one Los Angeles Police officer charged with criminal misconduct poses no conflict of interest, even though he once met with former officer Rafael Perez to discuss his cocaine thefts, a judge ruled Wednesday.

Attorney Paul DePasquale, who represents police sergeant Brian Liddy in a conspiracy charge, once consulted with Perez about representing him prior to his arrest for stealing cocaine from a police evidence locker room in 1998.

Perez, the government's key witness in the corruption investigation, is cooperating with authorities about his knowledge of alleged police misconduct in the Rampart division's anti-gang unit in exchange for a reduced prison sentence following a felony cocaine conviction.

  TIMELINE
The police case over time Gang prevention group sues LAPD, claiming harassment
  MESSAGE BOARD
  LEGAL RESOURCES

Latest Legal News

Law Library

FindLaw Consumer Center

After a two-hour closed door meeting with Perez and attorney DePasquale Monday, California Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor ruled that Perez's revelations were "peripheral, brief and minimal" to the criminal conspiracy charge against sergeant Liddy.

Perez attorney Winston Kevin McKesson claimed their meeting was confidential and DePasquale had a "duty of loyalty" to Perez.

"Mr. DePasquale is now referring to Perez as an admitted thief, liar and perjuror," said McKesson. "DePasquale spoke with him about the theft of cocaine and it's clear his conviction will become a focal point particularly on matters related to vigorous cross examination."

"I understand Perez as a witness may feel uncomfortable, but there is no reason confidence is compromised, therefore, as far as I am concerned in this case, there is no conflict of interest," said Judge Pastor.

Liddy and two other officers are accused of conspiring to frame alleged gang member Allan Lobos in 1996 on a weapons charge. Perez told investigators that he was involved in the arrest and believes a gun was planted, according to a criminal complaint.


Lobos pleaded guilty to those charges and was sentenced to state prison. His conviction was overturned following Perez's sworn testimony but Lobos remains in prison for an unrelated felony conviction.

In other developments Wednesday, prosecutors were prepared to hand over 3,400 pages of sworn testimony by Perez to defense attorneys but the judge required audio tapes and notes taken from those interviews included. A hearing on that matter was scheduled for next week.

Prosecutors are also seeking a gag order in the criminal trial of three officers accused of framing Lobos. Defense attorneys accused prosecutors of "orchestrating a public silence campaign" because Los Angeles District Attorney Gil Garcetti is badly trailing in his re-election effort, according to defense attorney Barry Levin.

District attorney spokeswoman Victoria Pipkin said it was "absolutely false" that politics motivated the gag order attempt. A decision on the gag order is scheduled for June 14.

To date, 92 cases have been dismissed in connection with the corruption scandal, according to court documents. At least 30 officers have been relieved of duty, fired or resigned since the scandal emerged in 1999, CNN has learned.



RELATED STORIES:
Officers in court in LAPD corruption case
June 2, 2000
2 more criminal convictions overturned in LA police probe
May 31, 2000
Four more convictions may be overturned in LAPD scandal
May 23, 2000
Credibility of key witness questioned in LAPD corruption cases
May 22, 2000
Pittsburgh settlement could be model for LAPD reforms
May 12, 2000
Los Angeles Police Department timeline
May 12, 2000

RELATED SITES:
New Jersey State Police homepage
American Civil Liberties Union
Pittsburgh Police Bureau
Los Angeles Police Department Web site
Justice Department Civil Rights Division
Los Angeles County District Attorney
U.S. Attorney's Office, Central District of California
Federal Bureau of Investigation


Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 Search


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.