Skip to main content
ad info

 
CNN.com  law center > supreme court
trials and cases
open forum
law library
 
Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
LAW
TOP STORIES

Prosecutor says witnesses saw rap star shoot gun in club

Embassy bombing defendants' confessions admissible, says U.S. Judge

Excerpt: John Grisham's 'A Painted House'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's GO.com is a goner

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image

find law dictionary
 

Supreme Court strikes down controversial Nebraska abortion law

Dr. Carhart
The Nebraska law, struck down today by the Supreme Court, was challenged by Dr. Leroy Carhart, one of the state's three abortion providers  

June 28, 2000
Web posted at: 10:30 a.m. EDT (1430 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A divided Supreme Court struck down a Nebraska law banning a controversial abortion procedure.

The justices, by a 5-4 vote, found that the law making it a crime to perform what anti-abortion activists call "partial birth abortions" was unconstitutional because it imposes an "undue burden" on women's decisions to end their pregnancies.

The Nebraska case was the first major abortion dispute to come before the U.S. Supreme Court since 1992, when the court reaffirmed the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision, which said the Constitution gives women the right to an abortion.

At issue in the case, Stenberg v. Carhart, was whether a 1997 Nebraska statute outlawing a procedure that critics call "partial birth" abortion illegally limits a woman's right to have an abortion.

  FULL TEXT
Stenberg v. Carhart
 
Background
More From FindLaw
 
 
Court opinions:
Party name:

Full-text:
-----------

Doctors call the procedure, where the fetus is partially removed from the vagina and the skull collapsed, intact dilation and extraction.

The facts of the case

Nebraska appealed a lower-court ruling that struck down the state law.

Nebraska unsuccessfully argued that the law does not place an "undue burden" on a woman's right to choose. The 1992 Supreme Court decision in Planned Parenthood v. Casey gave states the power to impose some limits on abortion, though the limits could not impose an "undue burden."

In September, a federal appeals court struck down laws in Nebraska, Iowa and Arkansas banning the procedure, ruling the bans could apply to commonly used abortion procedures, thus limiting a woman's right to an abortion.

But in October, another appeals court upheld similar laws in Wisconsin and Illinois, saying the statutes could be narrowly enforced.

The Supreme Court agreed to take the case in large part because of the conflict between the two appeals courts.

Carhart's challenge

The Nebraska law was challenged by Dr. LeRoy Carhart, one of the state's three abortion providers and the only one who performed the controversial procedure.

Under the law, which has been blocked pending the Supreme Court ruling, a physician faced felony charges, including up to 20 years in prison, a $25,000 fine, or both, and lose his or her license.

Carhart said the ban was so broad that "it would criminalize 98 percent of the abortions in Nebraska today."



RELATED STORIES:
For more LAW news, myCNN.com will bring you news from the areas and subjects you select.

RELATED SITES:
U. S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals 1999 decision

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 Search


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.