Skip to main content
ad info

 
CNN.com  law center > news
trials and cases
open forum
law library
  Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
LAW
TOP STORIES

Prosecutor says witnesses saw rap star shoot gun in club

Embassy bombing defendants' confessions admissible, says U.S. Judge

Excerpt: John Grisham's 'A Painted House'

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Bush signs order opening 'faith-based' charity office for business

Rescues continue 4 days after devastating India earthquake

DaimlerChrysler employees join rapidly swelling ranks of laid-off U.S. workers

Disney's GO.com is a goner

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

U.S.

POLITICS

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

TRAVEL

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
 
CNN Websites
Networks image

find law dictionary
 

Report: Judge junkets may taint environmental rulings

judges
The report says federal judges Ginsburg (left) and Williams voted against EPA limits on smog and soot after attending a purportedly pro-business environmental seminar at a Montana resort  

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- More than 200 judges may have been influenced to rule against the environment in court cases after being attending all-expenses-paid trips to conferences and seminars organized by business group, a report says.

The report released this week by the Community Rights Counsel, a public interest law firm, says 237 judges took 539 trips over a three-year period.

Each trip, to dude ranches and lush resorts, was worth thousands of dollars and was paid for by several conservative organizations that favor property rights in environmental disputes, the report said.

For instance, the report says District of Columbia federal judges Douglas Ginsburg and Stephen Williams voted against the Environmental Protection Agency's limits on smog and soot after attending a purportedly pro-business environmental seminar at a Montana resort. The Supreme Court will review the case this fall.

  MESSAGE BOARD
How much impact do you think these junkets have on judges?
Environmental issues
  LEGAL RESOURCES

Latest Legal News

Law Library

FindLaw Consumer Center

"While you can't prove influence in specific cases, it's hard to imagine a week spent listening on one side of a contentious issue won't have some impact," said Doug Kendall, CCR's executive director. "Judges are taught how and why to strike down federal environmental protections. Some judges appear to be listening."

In 1993, Williams ruled against timber interests when the endangered spotted owl was at risk of extinction. After a seminar at Elk Creek Ranch in Idaho, Williams reversed his role, the group charged.

Neither Ginsburg nor Williams was available for comment.

While most judges are honest and do not engage in activities that present potential conflict of interest, some actions like taking free trips organized by special interests clouds the judicial branch, former chief judge at the D.C. federal circuit Abner Mikva wrote in a foreword to the report.

"If an actual party to a case took the judge to a resort, all expenses paid, shortly before the case was heard, it would not matter what they talked about. Even if all they discussed were their prostate problems, the judge and the party would be perceived to be acting improperly," he wrote.

The CCR, whose backers include CNN founder Ted Turner's Turner Foundation, has questioned the ethics of judge's junkets before. The link to specific opinions is new.

The rebuttal from business groups

tree
The seminars and conferences are paid for by several conservative organizations that favor property rights in environmental disputes, the report says  

Businessman John Baden said that the seminars run by his Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment -- or FREE -- are not funded with corporate money. FREE is one of the business groups identified as one of the most active organizers of judicial junkets.

"These are foundations established by people who've been absent by death for many, many years. There's no possibility of them appearing before a judge," he said.

FREE'S program for the judges' 1998 session ranged from a program on from environmental economics to one on beavers and ranchers.

"You're going to see this sort of analysis that we present to the judges is right down the strike zone. It's mainstream stuff," Baden said.

CRR says ban seminars for judges

The CCR wants a ban of privately funded seminars for judges.

Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry is proposing legislation to provide more federal funds for judicial education to end the appearance of conflict.

CNN Senior Washington Correspondent Charles Bierbauer contributed to this report.



RELATED STORIES:
For more LAW news, myCNN.com will bring you news from the areas and subjects you select.

RELATED SITES:
Community Rights Counsel - Taking Back Community Rights
Welcome to Trip for Judges
F.R.E.E. Home Page. Non-Profit Organizations in the Montana Rocky Mountains, Seminars For Federal Judges, Environment / Public Environmental Policy, Park Reform. FREE.
Federal Judicial Center Internet homepage


Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 Search


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.