River watch: Is Columbia tapped out?

Bonneville Dam on the Columbia River is one of the centers of controversy involving the river's water flow

By Environmental News Network staff

In a move to help imperiled salmon runs, a Seattle-based environmental group says Washington state should stop allowing water to be diverted from the Columbia River.

The Center for Environmental Law and Policy and other conservation groups on Wednesday petitioned the state's Department of Ecology, asking the agency to put a moratorium on new water withdrawals from the river.

If the state denies the request, a lawsuit is a possibility, according to Kristie Carevich, an attorney with the group.

The issue of flow and water rights continues to be a contentious one in the Pacific Northwest. For the past four years, flow rates have dipped below federal targets in the Columbia and Snake rivers, where more than a dozen salmon and steelhead species are listed on the federal Endangered Species Act.

Those targets are meant to estimate how much water is needed to push salmon toward the ocean. Slower water means temperatures in the river can rise, water quality suffers and young salmon have a tougher time migrating, Carevich said.

Meanwhile, Washington is under increasing pressure to allow more water to be diverted from the Columbia. There are about 400 applications pending for water appropriations, including many for eastern Washington farmers looking to irrigate their crops, according to the department.

Adding to the mix are lawsuits filed in late October by cities and irrigators in eastern Washington to speed up the processing of water rights applications.

The Department of Ecology closed the Columbia and the Snake to new water withdrawals in 1992 to study whether the river could support new water uses. The department hasn't completed its studies, but the state legislature in 1997 told state officials to start processing water requests again.

Carevich said it's a mistake to allow more water to be taken from the Columbia, especially at a time when British Columbia, Idaho and the federal Bureau of Reclamation are making efforts to return water to give endangered salmon a boost.

Concerned about reduced flow rates in the Columbia River, environmentalists want to put a moratorium on further withdrawals to protect salmon populations

"It just doesn't make any sense," she said, adding that Washington is also funding measures to improve stream flows. "Yet it's about to go against that."

In a letter to Tom Fitzsimmons, the ecology department's director, the group said that further water appropriations would have the state "pushing these species closer to extinction and ignoring its responsibilities as a steward of Washington's water resources."

They say that the federal Fish Passage Center, created by the Northwest Power Planning Council to monitor fish counts and water flows on the Columbia and Snake, has documented a direct correlation between higher flows and salmon survival.

But Mary Getchell, a spokeswoman for the ecology department, said there are uncertainties in linking salmon survival with river flows.

"We absolutely believe that water that's cool and clean is necessary for the survival of salmon," she said. "But as far as in-stream flow, the science is unsettled on the Columbia River ... Those are very scientific policy issues that the Department of Ecology is wrestling with."

Carevich countered that the claim of uncertainty a delay tactic. "That dispute was created by a lot of people that want to hold off a decision."

Getchell said the department will review the petition and then decide, with consultation from the legislature, whether to start a rule-making process to implement a moratorium. If so, it could take one or two years to come up with a final decision, she said.

The conservation groups, though, are calling for an immediate halt to water appropriations on the Columbia. A new report from the Center for Environmental Law and Policy, entitled "Columbia River Vision," says there simply isn't enough water in the Columbia and its tributaries to meet "fish-critical needs."

"This petition should be a wake-up call to those claiming that the Columbia Basin salmon can be recovered without significant change," said Rob Masonis of American Rivers, one of the groups that filed Wednesday's petition. "We should focus on identifying solutions to the challenges we face, such as improving water use efficiency and finding alternative means of providing the economic benefits of the lower Snake River dams."

Other groups filing the petition were Friends of the Earth and WaterWatch of Oregon.

Copyright 2000, Environmental News Network, All Rights Reserved

Dam removal: Too little, too late for salmon?
November 3, 2000
River ladder aids salmon's uphill battle
October 27, 2000
Salmon battered by man and nature
October 27, 2000
Alaska salmon earn landmark seal of approval
September 7, 2000

Dam removal: Too little, too late for salmon
Corps barging in on salmon recovery, say conservationists
Grain will flow despite snake dam removals
Report supports removal of 4 Snake dams
Study opens floodgates on dam removal
Redfish, Bluefish hits the airwaves
NMFS outlines options for Northwest salmon
Snake river dams defy Clean Water Act

Center for Environmental Law and Policy
Department of Ecology
Endangered Species Act
Washington Department of Ecology
American Rivers
Friends of the Earth
WaterWatch of Oregon

Note: Pages will open in a new browser window

External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.