Compton supporters seek reprieve for condemned observatory
| |
The observatory was launched in 1991
| |
May 25, 2000
Web posted at: 12:02 PM EDT (1602 GMT)
From Correspondent Miles O'Brien
(CNN) -- NASA plans to bring down the Compton Gamma Ray
Observatory in less than two weeks, but some scientists want
to stop the satellite from becoming the largest spacecraft
ever brought down in a deliberate, controlled crash.
A final rocket thrust would aim it into a remote area of the
Pacific Ocean, reducing the risk that the 17-ton observatory
might crash into a populated area.
Concern over failing gyroscopes onboard the aging observatory
prompted the NASA decision. Yet some astronomers contend it
could make important observations in the future, and consider
the concerns over safety extreme.
 | INTERACTIVE |
|
| | |
 | ALSO |
|
| | |
"I think it has a lot of good years left. It is a real
tragedy to bring it down at this point," said physicist Jim
Ryan. Part of the Compton project for years, Ryan now spends
nearly all of his time fighting to save the observatory.
The $600 million observatory went into orbit nine years ago
aboard the space shuttle Atlantis. It quickly transformed
astrophysics, changing the way scientists thought about
quasars, black holes and supernovas.
"In essence we really revolutionized the field," Ryan said.
But the aging satellite has shown signs of wear in recent
years. One of its three gyroscopes failed in December. It
needs two working gyroscopes for a safe descent, according to
NASA. Worried about another failure, space agency managers
decided to send the orbiter into the South Pacific on June 4.
"To me this is a rather simple decision. It all comes down to
what is the safest thing for innocent people on Earth," said
Ed Weiler, NASA associate administrator.
A gyroscope-guided entry would mean a one in 29 million
chance that a piece of the falling satellite hurt someone,
according to NASA. Without the gyroscopes, the risk increases
to one in 4 million.
But former NASA astronaut Jay Apt, who helped deploy Compton,
thinks the odds are acceptable. He wonders if the space
agency has overreacted in the wake of the embarrassing loss
last year of the Mars Climate Orbiter and Mars Polar Lander.
"If you look back at NASA's history, that's often been the
case. There has been an accident and people have gone back to
an ultra safe mode for quite a bit of time," Apt said.
Ryan also expressed disappointment with the agency.
"That is not the NASA that put a man on the moon. Instead of
'Can do,' it is shrug your shoulders and, 'C'est la vie.'"
The timing is unfortunate for scientists who study gamma rays. The
sun is about to reach the peak of its 11-year solar cycle,
boosting solar activity and bombarding the planets with gamma
rays.
Compton supporters have asked for a temporary stay of
execution so alternatives can be studied. NASA has not
budged.
"It is not a rocket science decision. It is almost a
philosophical decision or a moral decision," Weiler said.
RELATED STORIES:
Huge NASA telescope headed for fiery descent in June
March 23, 2000
Australian telescope searching southern skies for black holes
May 9, 2000
Huge NASA telescope may be headed for fiery descent to splash landing
January 14, 2000
RELATED SITES:
NASA Homepage
Compton Gamma Ray Observatory
Shuttle Orbiter Atlantis (OV-104)
Jim Ryan's page
Life aboard the Shuttle
Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
|