ad info

 
CNN.com  U.S. News
myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Free E-mail | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
U.S.
TOP STORIES

California braced for weekend of power scrounging

Court order averts strike against Union Pacific railroad

U.S. warning at Davos forum

Two more Texas fugitives will contest extradition

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Thousands dead in India; quake toll rapidly rising

Davos protesters confront police

California readies for weekend of power scrounging

Capriati upsets Hingis to win Australian Open

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

POLITICS

LAW

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

HEALTH

TRAVEL

FOOD

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:


Justice Department calls Microsoft proposal 'ineffective'

graphic

May 11, 2000
Web posted at: 3:16 a.m. EDT (0716 GMT)

From Correspondent Terry Frieden

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Justice Department says Microsoft's response to a government plan to break up the company, outlined by Microsoft in a court filing, is ineffective and would not repair damage to its competition.

"Microsoft's proposal is ineffective and filled with loopholes. It would not have prevented Microsoft from engaging in many of the illegal acts found by the District Court, nor would it prevent the company from using its monopoly power in the future to engage in the same kind of illegal behavior to crush new innovations," the Justice statement says.

  ALSO
 
MORE FROM FindLaw
  MESSAGE BOARD
 

"For example Microsoft's proposal would not prevent: attempts to divide markets with competitors; retaliation against PC manufacturers and software developers that support non-Microsoft technologies; or using tying to require PC manufacturers to ship other Microsoft products with Windows.

"In sum, the proposal fundamentally fails to repair the damage to competition caused by Microsoft's illegal acts, or prevent Microsoft from committing similar violations in the future.

"In contrast, our proposal would address the serious violations found by the court, and it would do so by stimulating competition and innovation, leading to better products and lower prices for consumers. If our proposal is adopted, neither the government nor an entrenched monopolist would decide what is best for consumers," the government statement.



RELATED STORIES:
Microsoft, Netscape battle over browser hole
May 10, 2000
TIME: Justice to Microsoft: Be afraid, be very afraid
April 24, 2000
Guilty verdict could boost Linux fortunes
April 11, 2000
Internet World participants sound off on Microsoft verdict
April 4, 2000
Microsoft rivals react
April 3, 2000
Legal lookahead for MSFT
April 3, 2000
Microsoft, DOJ timeline
April 3, 2000
Microsoft talks fail: Mediation effort "fruitless"; judge's final ruling expected soon
April 1, 2000
Microsoft seeks to settle
March 24, 2000

RELATED SITES:
Microsoft's Homepage
U.S. Department of Justice


Note: Pages will open in a new browser window
External sites are not endorsed by CNN Interactive.
 Search   


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.