ad info

 
CNN.com  U.S. News
myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Free E-mail | Feedback  

 

  Search
 
 

 
U.S.
TOP STORIES

California braced for weekend of power scrounging

Court order averts strike against Union Pacific railroad

U.S. warning at Davos forum

Two more Texas fugitives will contest extradition

(MORE)

TOP STORIES

Thousands dead in India; quake toll rapidly rising

Davos protesters confront police

California readies for weekend of power scrounging

Capriati upsets Hingis to win Australian Open

(MORE)

MARKETS
4:30pm ET, 4/16
144.70
8257.60
3.71
1394.72
10.90
879.91
 


WORLD

POLITICS

LAW

TECHNOLOGY

ENTERTAINMENT

HEALTH

TRAVEL

FOOD

ARTS & STYLE



(MORE HEADLINES)
*
  E-MAIL:
Subscribe to one of our news e-mail lists.
Enter your address:
Or:
Get a free e-mail account

 DISCUSSION:
 message boards
 chat
 feedback

  CNN WEB SITES:
CNN Websites
 AsiaNow
 En Español
 Em Português
 Svenska
 Norge
 Danmark
 Italian

 FASTER ACCESS:
 europe
 japan

 TIME INC. SITES:
 CNN NETWORKS:
Networks image
 more networks
 transcripts

 SITE INFO:
 help
 contents
 search
 ad info
 jobs

 WEB SERVICES:


from:
Time.com

The Supreme Court may just have helped Al Gore

May 16, 2000
Web posted at: 3:36 PM EDT (1936 GMT)

(TIME.com) -- The Supreme Court may just have lent a hand to Al Gore's somewhat struggling presidential campaign. As the vice president on Monday learned that he was trailing George W. Bush in the polls, the Justices, in a 5-4 decision, struck down the six-year-old Violence Against Women Act, a measure that allows victims of rape, domestic violence and other "gender" crimes to sue their attackers in federal court. In their opinion, the prevailing Justices expressed concern that a sweeping application of the logic behind the act -- that such a crime interferes with interstate commerce by making women fearful of, say, commuting from New Jersey to New York to work -- could destroy individual states' rights to police and govern their own citizens. The decision has led to worries that other civil rights legislation, such as pending hate crime bills and existing racial-bias laws, could be threatened if the Court continues to have a conservative bent.

*  RELATEDTime.com
The New York Times
Women Lose Their Right to Sue Attackers in Federal Court

Newsfile
Campaign 2000
 

"For those who care about the Court and what kind of appointments a new president will make, this is a marker decision," says TIME legal reporter Alain Sanders. Voters, he explains, may want to take into consideration whether they want a Supreme Court that will continue to take a strict states-rights view or one that believes that not all injustices -- such as civil rights -- can be sorted out at the local level. For instance, says Sanders, if the current Court had applied its reasoning to core civil rights legislation adopted in mid-century, it's possible we'd still be without federal laws protecting citizens from discrimination based on race, religion or gender. If Al Gore is smart, adds Sanders, he'll capitalize on this situation by galvanizing voters with the promise that the highest court in the land will have a more liberal look under his presidency. After all, the just-dismissed law was passed by a relatively conservative Congress, and with legal analysts predicting that as many as four Justices could retire by 2004, the makeup of the Supreme Court for many years lies in the balance.

Copyright © 2000 Time Inc.


 Search   


Back to the top   © 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.