|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Peruvian election board decides to press ahead with vote
LIMA, Peru -- Despite a day of violent protests, Peru's top electoral body has decided Sunday's presidential run-off vote will go ahead. The National Election Board announced Thursday that it "exhorts the people to elect their next president and vice president on May 28, 2000." The runoff between President Alberto Fujimori and challenger Alejandro Toledo follows a first round of voting marred by charges of irregularities and ballot rigging. International monitors, the opposition candidate and the thousands of protesters who took to the streets of the capital in violent demonstrations Thursday have demanded the second round's postponement. "I'm very sorry that President Alberto Fujimori and the National Election Board have decided to push the country to a crisis with unforeseen consequences," Toledo said. Toledo has called on his supporters to boycott Sunday's ballot after he failed in a move to have voting pushed back by three weeks to correct what he claimed were imbalances in the system. Thousands of students and workers who support his stance clashed with police in Lima's central square after tearing up paving stones to throw at the walls of the Government Palace.
The protesters earlier tried to storm the headquarters of the National Election Board. Riot police repelled them with tear gas and surrounded the building. At least one person was injured by the canisters thrown into the crowd by police. The angry protesters also burned tires in the street. The protests followed a call from international election monitors that Sunday's runoff between Fujimori and Toledo be postponed for 10 days due to irregularities it perceived in the government's preparations for the election.
U.S.-based monitors pull outThe joint delegation from the U.S-based National Democratic Institute and Carter Center has canceled plans to monitor the runoff. "The election on May 28 will not meet minimal international standards for a credible, democratic election," said Barry Levitt, a senior political analyst with the delegation. Eduardo Stein, head of the election-monitoring mission of the Organization of American States, also said his mission would not carry out an independent vote count of Sunday's election because of the irregularities. "This delegation cannot commit itself to the May 28 vote. We insist that for May 28, this mission does not have the capacity to carry out what they (government officials) have asked for," Stein told reporters. OAS monitors issued a report earlier on Thursday saying that testing of the country's ballot-counting computers on Wednesday had "a positive result." But the organization has criticized a series of other irregularities in the electoral process, including the lack of training for vote counters. Opposition supporters have made charges of vote-rigging since April's first round, when continual delays in the count sparked street protests. Toledo has demanded a three-week postponement of the runoff and has said he will not recognize the result unless his demand is met. Before the election board ruling was announced, the U.S. government expressed "strong backing and support" for OAS efforts to ensure free and fair elections. Mike Hammer, spokesman for the U.S. National Security Council, said in Washington it was in U.S. interests "that whomever ultimately wins be seen as fully legitimate by the Peruvian people and the international community." A victory on Sunday would give Fujimori a third five-year term in power but some observers questioned if his victory would be internationally recognized. "The victory would be viewed as illegitimate," said Arturo Porzecanski, chief economist for the Americas at the New York financial firm ING Barings. "I think the U.S. government, European governments and many Latin American governments will distance themselves from Peru in various ways -- diplomatically, in trade, in financial support. I see isolation descending on Peru." He said international sentiment is far different from 1992 when Fujimori suspended Congress and the Supreme Court, accusing them of obstructing his efforts to battle leftist Shining Path guerillas and make economic reforms. At the time, Porzecanski said, many governments were sympathetic. Jose Miguel Vivanco, director of Washington-based Human Rights Watch, also warned that Fujimori would suffer serious consequences if he ignored calls for a postponement. "If he carries out the election as the only candidate in conditions that have been widely questioned, I think from a political viewpoint, from a viewpoint of international relations, it would be suicide for Fujimori," said Vivanco, who is in Peru to observe the electoral process. But independent sources in Lima also criticized Toledo's stance in boycotting the vote. "He is an indecisive man, unscrupulous, not serious in his commitments and incapable of understanding the subtlety of political negotiations," a high-ranking election monitoring official told Reuters. "There is a great disappointment in diplomatic circles." Correspondent Harris Whitbeck and Reuters contributed to this report. RELATED STORIES: OAS to monitor crucial test of electoral computers in Peru RELATED SITES: Bienvenidos al Ministerio de la Presidencia (Spanish) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to the top |
© 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Read our privacy guidelines. |