Skip to main content /LAW
CNN.com /LAW
CNN TV
EDITIONS





find law dictionary
 

Judge: Media can attend immigration hearing

From Brad Wright
CNN Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The media can attend the court hearing of a Lebanese man being held in Michigan on immigration charges, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Court Judge Nancy G. Edmunds granted a preliminary junction to the Detroit News and Detroit Free Press, allowing the newspaper to cover the court proceedings of Rabih Haddad, a Lebanese native charged with overstaying his visa.

The Justice Department had argued that a directive issued by Chief Immigration Judge Michael Creppy in the days after September 11 allowed immigration proceedings to be closed in certain circumstances so they would not impair U.S. authorities' ability to wage the war against terrorism.

Last December, a judge cited Creppy's directive in ordering that the press and public be removed from the court room during a bond hearing for Rabih Haddad, a Lebanese native charged with overstaying his visa.

The newspapers, along with Haddad and U.S. Rep. John Conyers D-Michigan, took the case to court, claiming the closure violated the Constitution. They cited the First Amendment, which guarantees the freedom of the press, and the Fifth Amendment, which promises "due process of law."

Attack on America
 CNN.COM SPECIAL REPORT
 CNN NewsPass Video 
Agencies reportedly got hijack tips in 1998
 MORE STORIES
Intelligence intercept led to Buffalo suspects
Report cites warnings before 9/11
 EXTRA INFORMATION
Timeline: Who Knew What and When?
Interactive: Terror Investigation
Terror Warnings System
Most wanted terrorists
What looks suspicious?
In-Depth: America Remembers
In-Depth: Terror on Tape
In-Depth: How prepared is your city?
 RESOURCES
On the Scene: Barbara Starr: Al Qaeda hunt expands?
On the Scene: Peter Bergen: Getting al Qaeda to talk

Defending Creppy's directive, the Justice Department argued that disclosing the names of "special interest" detainees could lead to public disclosure of their associates, who could potentially be harmed by terrorists.

Releasing the names would also reveal the scope and progress of terrorism investigations, possibly impairing authorities' ability to talk with detainees, federal lawyers argued.

But Edmunds noted that because the detainees' names were released at the outset of the hearings and nothing prohibits the release of names themselves to the media.

The government had shown no compelling interest in closing the hearing "even under the most deferential standards of review," she said.

Charles Miller, a Justice Department spokesman, said Edmunds' ruling was under review and no decision had been reached on an appeal.



 
 
 
 



RELATED SITES:

 Search   

Back to the top