Burrell case: Buckingham Palace statement

SPECIAL REPORT • Charles's office defends inquiry • What queen knew about Burrell • Scope of royal inquiry criticised • Profile: Inquiry head Michael Peat • Royal crisis: Cast of characters ABOVE THE LAW * The queen is the only person in the UK who cannot be prosecuted * She is the chief prosecutor and all prosecutions are brought in her name: Regina v. ......... * Prince Charles and other members of the royal family can be prosecuted * The last British royal in court was King Charles I in 1649 for treason. He was executed * Prince Charles's sister, Princess Anne, is due in court on November 21 to face allegations that her dog bit two children * Although royals have faced speeding charges in the past they have been dealt with via letter

(CNN) -- This is a statement released by Buckingham Palace on November 12, 2002, headed Background Chronology of the Queen's Involvement in the Burrell Case:

In December 1997, the Queen met Mr Burrell privately for about one and a half hours at his request. In the course of the discussion Mr Burrell mentioned that he had taken some of the Princess's papers for safekeeping. No response was sought from the Queen and none was given. Following the raid on Mr Burrell's house in January 2001, the Prince of Wales's private secretary informed the Queen's private secretary that none of the Queen's personal possessions had been found. Sir Robin Janvrin reported this to the Queen and advised her that there was therefore no basis for any involvement in the police investigation.

On April 3, 2001 at the suggestion of the Prince of Wales's private secretary, the Queen's private secretary attended a police/CPS briefing at St James's Palace as an observer. During this briefing the police outlined the possible charges and said that they were investigating whether Mr Burrell had been selling some of the items. Following this meeting Sir Robin Janvrin reported to the Queen and advised that he had agreed with the Prince of Wales's private secretary that all further liaison with the police would be a matter for St James's Palace.

On September 21, 2001 a letter was received from Paul Burrell's solicitor asking for a meeting to discuss Paul Burrell's life and service with the Royal Family. This was declined because the Queen was not involved with the case and a meeting might have been misinterpreted as interference in the judicial process.

In the autumn of 2001, the Queen's private secretary was told informally by the Prince of Wales's private secretary that the police had told the Prince of Wales that they had evidence that Paul Burrell had been selling items from the Princess's estate. He mentioned this to the Queen.

On October 22, 2002 it was made clear during the trial that, contrary to their earlier advice, the police had no evidence that Paul Burrell had been selling the items in question.

On October 25, The Queen, the Duke of Edinburgh and the Prince of Wales discussed the case in the car en route to the Bali Memorial Service at St Paul's. The Queen mentioned the meeting with Paul Burrell five years ago, and his statement that he had taken some of the Princess's papers for safekeeping. Given the importance to the prosecution case of the question of whether or not Mr Burrell had told anyone that he had taken items from Kensington Palace, the relevance of this information was realised and quickly drawn to the attention of the police.

Buckingham Palace Press Office, 12 November, 2002.

Iran poll to go to run-off • U.N.: Truck bomb killed Hariri • EU 'crisis' after summit failure • U.S. House votes to keep U.N. dues

CNN/Money: Security alert issued for 40 million credit cards • Bin Laden deputy sends message • U.S. House votes to keep U.N. dues • Iran poll to go to run-off