|Editions | myCNN | Video | Audio | Headline News Brief | Feedback||
Defense Secretary Cohen Vows United States Will Track Down USS Cole AttackersAired October 12, 2000 - 3:00 p.m. ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
(JOINED IN PROGRESS)
WILLIAM COHEN, DEFENSE SECRETARY: ... however, we determine that terrorists attacked our ship and killed our sailors, then we will not rest until we have tracked down those who are responsible for this vicious and cowardly act.
The United States is a global power with global responsibilities, and as a result, we face global risks.
In the wake of this tragedy, I want to be very clear about one point: We will continue to protect our national interests around the world, in the Middle East and elsewhere. No one should doubt our resolve to remain a force for peace and for stability. And no one should assume that they can force us to retreat. No one should assume that they can attack us with impunity.
All Americans can be proud of the men and women who protect our country around the world. The world is safer because of their service and their dedication to our ideals of freedom and security makes their loss even more painful.
Force protection is my top priority when I deploy troops, and it's the top priority of every commander. But we know that our vigilance cannot eliminate all risk.
In the wake of this tragedy, we have increased the alert level of all of our forces around the world, at home and abroad. The Navy has dispatched medical teams and additional security teams to Aden.
And British and French officials have offered assistance to evacuate and to treat our wounded.
The departments of State and Justice have dispatched investigators to learn what's responsible for the blast.
The tragedies that test our strength and our resolve occur and have occurred in the past. We have passed the test of measuring up to those responsibilities, and we will pass that test once again today.
I would like to ask all Americans to join me in the prayers for the families of those who were killed and wounded. Their loved ones were serving all of us. Before I turn this over to Admiral Clark, I'd like to say we're prepared to answer as many questions as we can this afternoon. But information continues to come in by the minute, and we want to make sure that we'll keep you updated as the day progresses. But we'll try to answer as many as we can, understanding some of the limitations that we have.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, just briefly, can I ask: Do you suspect terrorism? And how could anything but launch and -- explosive device or explosives caused a hole like that in the side of a ship, a blast like that?
COHEN: I think, as I've indicated, if, as it appears, that this was the act of terrorists, then we will certainly do everything in our power to track them down and hold them accountable.
We don't want to reach the conclusive judgment at this point. It has the appearance of an act of terrorism. Admiral Clark has some photographs which he will share with you.
You should also know that we have asked the networks not to continue to run photographs, pictures, of those who have been wounded since we have not yet been able to notify all of the families.
COHEN: And so we prefer to make that notification immediately ourselves and hope that that request can be abided by. But Admiral Clark does have some photographs of the ship, and he will explain in greater detail the nature of the impact on the ship itself.
QUESTION: Did somebody claim responsibility for this?
COHEN: Not to my knowledge. There's been no claim of responsibility at this point.
QUESTION: A follow-up: If you find someone, credibly, who is responsible, do you plan any kind of retaliatory attack?
COHEN: Well, as I've indicated, we will take appropriate measures to hold those responsible.
QUESTION: How about reports -- how about reports, I'm sorry, that two men were aboard that small boat and apparently stood at attention just when the blast went off?
COHEN: Well, I'd like to wait for the full inquiry in this. There have been a number of reports. I think right now Admiral Clark would like to brief you on some of the details. And then we'll answer those questions.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, this is a part of the world which has been tense for years; force protection's always very high. With all due respect, what are your concerns about how a potential terrorist could have penetrated U.S. military security? How could they have approached a U.S. military asset? How could something like this happen?
COHEN: As I've indicated in the past, there are -- we are a global power. We have global responsibilities, and there are risks associated with that. We take force protection as a very highest of priorities.
Admiral Clark is going to brief you in terms of the measures basically that we take to protect our forces. We don't go into detail specifically in what measures we take, but we are at a very substantial state of force protection.
We continue to be at that state of protection and have actually increased it even further. But every area in the region certainly poses potential risks to our soldiers and Marines and airmen and other forces.
QUESTION: And briefly, to follow up, you said you have raised the alert status of U.S. forces around the world. Can you tell us are there any other threats or warnings that you have received today against U.S. military forces?
COHEN: I don't want to go into specific threats as such. We think it's just prudent in the wake of what has happened to make sure that we are more aware of what is taking place. So it's just a precautionary measure.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, was there any intelligence that indicated that this attack might have taken place even looking back in retrospect? Were there any warning signals that you missed that this threat might have existed?
COHEN: I don't think we missed any specific threats. There are general threats in the region. And we understand that, and that's the reason why we have such precautionary measures we take. I believe that Admiral Clark will indicate that the nature of this particular situation would not have -- been very difficult if not impossible to protect against this type of incident.
QUESTION: Can I follow that, sir? Is this an example of asymmetric warfare that you've warned about is in our future?
COHEN: Well, the answer is yes. This is precisely the kinds of threats that we face, where countries are unwilling to take us on head-to-head, but will resort to acts of terrorism in order to achieve their goal.
Again, if the facts substantiate that this was a terrorist act, it would fall into the category of using an asymmetrical means of attacking a larger force.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, do you think that...
ADM. VERN CLARK, CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS: Thank you, Mr. Secretary. I'll get right to the point. The secretary has already indicated that our indications are that this event occurred at approximately 5:15 this morning, East Coast time, while the ship, the USS Cole, was mooring at a fueling facility in Yemen.
The guided missile destroyer Cole was apparently attacked by terrorists in a small boat.
And I say "apparently" because the investigation is going to have to reach the bottom-line on this situation. But from a personal point of view, and what I know about the ship and the events that have been described to me, I have no reason to think that this was anything but a senseless act of terrorism.
At this point, as the secretary's indicated, nobody has claimed responsibility for this act.
Let me first say, that all of us in the Navy, and I have been called by people from across the -- around the world today, all of us are deeply saddened by the loss of our shipmates. They, like generations of sailors before them, have made the ultimate sacrifice serving their country.
I want to also commend the crew of the USS Cole. As we speak, there are 250 men and women on that ship battling for their ship and battling for their shipmates. They have performed superbly. They have done what they need to do to control and limit the flooding and the damage that has occurred to the ship.
The commanding officer reports that they have the situation under control. Now, we do have some photos to show you, and they're going to appear over here on this side. And this first picture is a photo of the Arleigh Burke class, the DDG-51 class.
Next slide, please.
This, of course, is where the event occurred, down here in Aden.
And this is a picture of the damage to the hull. And you can see that it is generally midships and the immediately damaged area is in one of the main engine rooms and an auxiliary engineering space.
Give me the next slide, please.
Now, this is a close-up of the hull, of the hull and the hole in the hull, and you can see that the damage has occurred at the water line, and you can also get a picture of the nature of the damage and the way the metal is bent and so forth. The hole is generally 20 feet high and 40 feet across.
As I indicated before, the captain indicates that they have the flooding under control.
In fact, they did early, very early in the evolution. And I would just like to say at this point that some of you know that until a few months ago, I was the commander in the Atlantic Fleet. And I remember specifically this ship, and the George Washington Battle Group of which she is part of, and going through the training and the certification for this group of ships as they were preparing to deploy.
They are trained in the specifics of force protection. And they are also -- when they arrive in theater, as was the case in this situation, they are required to submit to their theater commander via the chain of command a force protection plan. And they in fact submit such a plan for every port visit that they are involved in.
Such was the case here. The planning was done, it was approved by the immediate superior in command, and they executed the plan as it was specified.
Now, you all have heard the reports throughout the day. The secretary has just indicated that there are now five fatalities on USS Cole. A dozen are missing.
We are working very hard to make the notifications to all of the families. And let me say that we're not talking now just about notifying five families. We are talking about 300 people that are on this ship. And all of them want to know the circumstances regarding their loved one.
We have set up -- the commander in chief of the Atlantic Fleet, Admiral Natter, has put procedures in effect to support the families. The media has been reporting the 1-800 number throughout the day, and that activity is progressing.
The secretary has also made reference to the point about those injured that were on television, and I am so appreciative of the willingness of the networks to cease with those reports, because the fact of the matter is, we're talking about 300 families and we have not completed all of the notifications.
I want to thank all of you who are involved in that. It is very much appreciated by Navy families.
You can imagine how I feel. My heart goes out to the family members of the crew of the Cole. This is a very difficult and trying time for them.
I am heartened, though, by the way people and the nation are reaching out to them, and people specifically in the Hampton Roads area. And of course, those crew members' families are from around the United States.
The secretary has described the eyewitness account that has been passed to us regarding the small boat approaching the USS Cole. Let me just say that the ability to deal with this kind of attack is limited by this circumstance. This small boat, by report, was involved in the mooring evolution. This was not a conventional pier, if you will. Rather, it was a fueling, it's called a fueling dolphin, but it is, in effect, a fueling facility out in the middle of the harbor. The mooring evolution, instead of being along side of pier, there are several mooring buoys that the ship attaches lines to. Small boats come to the ship and the lines drop down to the them and the boat takes the line to the mooring buoy. This is what happened in this circumstance. And the report I have is that this small boat was involved in that activity. And then returning from one buoy, came along side.
The crew is continuing to control the damage. They do have power aboard. There were reports today that they did not have power. Early in the evolution, they did lose power. Their emergency supplies are operating and have been for the bulk of the day. They have the fuel required on board to continue operations in the near future.
We have two ships in route to scene. Two United States ships are now around 300 miles away and are closing the Port of Aden, and expect them to be there sometime tomorrow. They're making best speed to get there.
We are also heartened by the support of other nations. And the secretary mentioned the support from the French, and they have a ship en route. And the British also have a ship that is en route. And I'm told just before I came in here that the United Kingdom -- or the French had an airplane on the ground that was supporting our people.
As we started this conference here, at about 3:00, it was our -- the timeline was that our first aircraft would arrive there that has a surgeon aboard and some other medical support.
It has some security people to enhance the security. And there are also some people there to help us assess the damage so that we can then do follow-on planning to determine the future course of action.
In closing, again, I just want to express my appreciation to the people who are reaching out to the men and women and the families of the United States Ship Cole.
QUESTION: Admiral Clark, why did the Cole stop in Yemen to refuel? And will you suspend refueling stops at Aden for the future?
CLARK: Well, let me say first of all that the decision for suspension of ops would rest under the control of the unified CINC in this case, General Franks. You know, this is -- in Goldwater-Nickles, he is responsible for the operations and the decisions on where that kind of activity takes place.
But let me put it in context. The ship is coming from Norfolk, through the Mediterranean, then down through the Red Sea. If we go back to the chart, if you go back a couple of slides, somewhere in this area you're going to have to fuel unless you have an oiler along with you. And so the decision was made to use this port. We have been in there on three other occasions in the last six months, since last May. And the decision was made to utilize this facility. As the secretary indicated earlier, with regards to a specific threat warning in that area, all of the circumstances that would -- all of the information that would be available to the unified commander in chief would be used to make a judgment about where you were going to have the ship pull in.
And as the secretary indicated, I know of nothing -- no kind of a warning or a threat indicator that would have made this something that the unified CINC would have decided.
QUESTION: Admiral, the Navy's reduced the number of oilers in recent years. Do we accept more risk by having fewer oilers?
CLARK: Well, in any circumstance, if you are always self- contained, that's a nice position to be in. The reality is that any battle group is operating with that kind of support. But we do not have enough ships to assign one to -- this ship was transiting independently, and we don't have enough resources to -- by the way, let me say, today, I have 101 ships in the United States Navy deployed to the four corners of the Earth. Cole is one those 101.
QUESTION: Could you tell us anything about the suspect? Was it a steel vessel of some kind?
CLARK: I can't tell you. I do not have any of that kind of information.
QUESTION: You don't know whether it was under contract by the Navy?
CLARK: I have no idea how that setup works over there.
QUESTION: What kind of security procedures were followed? Were there armed security personnel on the deck? And did they have any of the fleet anti-terrorism support teams that normally go with...
CLARK: I described earlier the requirement to have an approved force-protection plan. Then there are a series of threat conditions in every theater in the world. Their threat-condition posture was threat-condition bravo.
I have talked to the commander a number of times today and reviewed the bidding on this. And they were in the posture that they were required to be in for this threat condition and entering this port, which would include armed personnel topside.
Now the reason that -- and the secretary alluded to this -- in this scenario that I have described to you, any commanding officer that was working in a situation in a port like this has to assess the threat and the movement of ships and boats and so forth in the harbor. And a boat that was involved in the mooring evolution, he wouldn't -- and was currently involved in it, he would not expect to be a threat. And now I believe that to be a certainty.
(CROSSTALK) QUESTION: Admiral, would you tell me, please, if it's a small boat, the type of bum boats that take mooring lines out, what kind of explosive would be aboard of a boat of that size? And we're told that all Arleigh Burke class destroyers have three inches of steel at the water line. Was this a shaped charge, do you believe? Or what could have caused a gaping hole of this size?
CLARK: I can't answer that. I'm not an explosives expert. I can tell you this: These are exactly the questions that need to be answered in the investigation. And the FBI is en route to the scene to deal with these kinds of questions.
Let me answer a specific with regard to the Arleigh Burke and her capability. She has different thicknesses on her hull throughout the ship.
It's not all the same in any given one place. I would tell you that the steel at this -- at the point of the water line is 51,000 pounds per square inch, and it is approximately half-inch steel. And so obviously this was a significant explosion.
Now, I think it's important that, you know, this is a warship, and one of the things to look at here is that they have power back on the ship and, you know, the crew is working hard to -- they're fighting for their ship. The damage is, from the picture you could see, is basically localized to that area. I don't have extensive -- I don't have significant information about what the conditions are inside. It was inside the -- that picture is inside the engine room, and I really don't have any information.
QUESTION: Admiral, two questions about the port. How much advance notice did the Port of Aden have that the Cole was coming in, first? And could you take us back into 1999 when the decision was made to use this port to refuel, because Yemen is well-known to be a headquarters for Hamas and several other terrorist groups?
CLARK: I don't have the specific timeline, but I believe it was 10 to 12 days that -- somewhere in that timeframe that the request to come into the port goes in through the embassy and so forth, and then the process is put in place for the contractor to execute the refueling.
Let me go to part number two. I really can't talk to the specifics in '99. I can just say this: We have been working to improve our relations with Yemen for sometime. And I'm sure that that was at the heart of the motivation of the unified commander as they are in improving our relations in that part of the world. But with regard to specifics, you need to talk to the CINC.
QUESTION: One might conclude from your earlier statements that a shortage of oilers or just simply the stresses of deployment resulted in this ship making a refueling stop in a more dangerous port, and had you had more resources that might not have been the case. Can you tell me whether that's fair? CLARK: I'm on record, I'd like to have more resources. But never would we send on an oiler -- I can't recall a circumstance in my career where we sent an oiler with a single ship.
QUESTION: ... have a chance to talk to the ship's captain? Or could you share with us any details from the crew that you might have received?
CLARK: I certainly have not talked personally to the ship's captain. He is a busy man. I have been speaking with the naval commander in the theater, Admiral Moore. And that's where I have my feedback.
Our comments have been confined to the steps -- the actions that we need to take and the actions that are being taken to support this ship the way she needs to be supported.
QUESTION: Admiral, was the boat that was involved in the explosion, was it a government boat, a Yemeni government boat, a contractor boat?
CLARK: I do not know.
QUESTION: Sir, any relation with the conflict in the Middle East?
COHEN: Is there any relation? We have no information it would be related to the conflict in the Middle East.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, can you review for us your assessment of the terrorism situation in Yemen? Who operates there? Who concerns you? Do you see Osama bin Laden and his network as being active in Yemen right now? And do you have any reason to believe that his network or associates could be involved in this incident?
COHEN: Well, we really don't have enough information to make any judgments at this point. We do know that terrorists are operating throughout the region, not just in Yemen but throughout the entire Middle East. It's pretty fluid. There are various groups who move in and move out. And so it's generally a high-alert area for virtually every area in the Middle East.
But I think it's just premature to make any link between Osama bin Laden or anyone else at this point until we have more information. We're still, as Admiral Clark has pointed out, we're still bailing out the water to make sure we don't take on more water in that particular ship.
And you will note from that last photograph -- and I think the admiral pointed out to me -- that there have been a number of reports of how badly the ship was listing. But in fact, if you look at that last photograph, you'll see a sailor up on the deck who's standing straight up over the gaping hole.
So it's a serious blow. They're working hard to maintain the ship, and they deserve great credit for it.
QUESTION: Could you give us an idea of what you're game plan is for the wounded and where do you plan to take them, how you plan to do that, and when?
CLARK: Yes, I certainly can. The medical -- I said that one -- the first medical assist team is arriving -- and should have arrived since we came down to this event.
QUESTION: From Bahrain?
CLARK: They are coming from Admiral Moore's theater and wherever exactly they were. I expect that they were from Bahrain.
CLARK: And then on the next flight, which is also in the air, is a larger medical assistance team. There is also another aircraft inbound, a medivac aircraft, that will be able to move people to a location that will be determined by the surgeons on scene. They will make the recommendations. And I expect all of that activity to occur over the evening hours here in the United States.
QUESTION: Did you have trouble getting any of these medical aircraft on the ground because of the condition and the length of the runway in Aden?
CLARK: I have not been notified of any problem in that regard.
QUESTION: ... Iraqi troop movements and whether you see any strange happening there?
COHEN: Well, there have been identified in the press accounts some Iraqi movements to the west. This is also a training cycle for the Iraqi military. But we're watching it very closely, because of the ambiguity of the situation, to make sure that Saddam is not using any training cycle in order to take advantage of any developments in the Middle East or elsewhere. But we have not seen any specific move that would indicate that he intends to cause any major controversy.
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you and the admiral have been very careful to (inaudible) terrorists. Do you have in mind any other scenario or possible cause other than terrorism that might have brought this about? COHEN: I don't have in mind any other causes of this. But again, I don't want to reach a judgment at this point. We have a team over there. They will make an assessment and we will follow it up very quickly.
There will be bomb experts; they will investigate the nature of the material that was used. That will help us in reaching judgments about how it occurred and perhaps lead to those responsible for it.
But I simply don't want to speculate at this point. As we've said, it's apparent; I'm going to leave it at that until such time as we can say conclusively what it was.
QUESTION: How many people were observed on the boat? And were they doing anything unusual? There are reports that they were standing at attention.
CLARK: I've heard the same reports you have. I don't know if they are accurate or not.
QUESTION: Was anybody observed on the small boat?
CLARK: I am told that two individuals were observed on the boat. But that is the same kind of hearsay -- I've heard a number of reports. I have not heard a report that said anything other than two, with regard to number count.
QUESTION: The two people -- was the small boat completely destroyed by the blast?
CLARK: I frankly never asked the question.
QUESTION: On the three occasions when you refueled since May in Yemen, was this fairly standard procedure that you had boats from the area help with mooring? It came as a routine event?
CLARK: That is absolutely a standard procedure in every port you go into in the world. You know, this is a large warship and so, as it is approaching a pier, instead of getting close enough to stick itself into the pier or something, virtually always you have a boat that assists you in getting the lines over. Then the lines help you moor the ship. So that's very standard.
QUESTION: So that contributes to the whole issue of it'd be hard to detect a threat here.
CLARK: Well, that's exactly right. And the fact that the individual apparently, by report, was involved in the evolution. QUESTION: And the fueling hadn't started yet, right?
CLARK: No. They were still tying up when this -- as this...
QUESTION: So no fuel could be exploding...
CLARK: That's correct.
QUESTION: ... because it didn't leak from the line.
QUESTION: Was there a pilot on board for this evolution?
CLARK: I do not know.
QUESTION: Does the Cole's crew include any women, and were any women among the injured?
CLARK: USS Cole is a mixed-gender ship.
CLARK: I'm not going to -- frankly, I don't have detailed knowledge of the injuries, but I do know that men and women were injured, but I don't have any idea what the balance would be.
QUESTION: ... force protection plan, and you said that force protection plans are in place. But wouldn't it make sense to send Navy personnel out to make sure that these boats coming toward you are actually part of the tender operations and not some sort of a threat? Is that a lapse, that you let these people come up so close to the boat without knowing really exactly who they are?
CLARK: Well, in my view, and you can accuse me of 31 years of experience in this and being involved in this activity and then just sort of taking it for granted, but the reality is is that when you enter a port like this you make contact with the port officials, you always do before you enter, you wouldn't think of going in without having them verbally clear you in. They tell you who -- that the individuals are there to support you.
You make assumptions about the credibility of that support, and I think that's appropriate and the way we deal with people all around the world. We don't automatically suspect people that are sent forward to help us in an official way.
This kind of a -- this kind of support is -- takes the tone of the arrangements made. We send our request to the embassy and they deal with the local people there. And I will tell you that the first report I had from this, via Admiral Moore, was from an embassy support person.
QUESTION: But, again, you really don't know what's coming toward you. Wouldn't it be wise to send some Navy personnel out before it gets close to the ship to make sure that these are... (CROSSTALK)
CLARK: Well, I think that's the same question, and the answer I just gave you would be the same.
QUESTION: Sir, does this appear to be an inside job, then?
CLARK: I think that you're going to have to get the -- we will all get the answer to that as the investigation moves along. I gave you my personal opinion based upon what I know now. I've described the information that I have available to me, and I can't tell you that the info that I've shared with you is 100 percent accurate. I mean, I have reports and that's what I'm sharing with you.
QUESTION: ... for families. Is there anything, other specifics you have for families -- can do or what's setup for families in the Norfolk areas?
CLARK: I've been in contact with the leadership in Norfolk several times today. And I have been in contact with the chief of naval personnel, who is working this. We have 32 operators on-line answering responses. The backlog has gotten to a point where an individual might wait, the maximum I've heard so far is up to two minutes to get a response. They are calling in and giving information on their loved one and the information that they are seeking.
We've also set up a facility at Norfolk at the air station there, where they have 24-hour support for the families and people on scene to assist them. And they're doing everything that they know how to do to support them. You can understand the anxiety that exists within the families. Everyone of them wants to know what is the status of their loved one.
I wish that there was a way to get an instantaneous report to each and every family. There isn't a way to do that. We are, for example, because the record communications channel was down, as a result of the explosion, we have been passing this information verbally. And you can imagine how important it is for us not to make a mistake on one of the individuals and what category they might be in.
CLARK: And so it's taking some time, they're working at it, they've got people committed to it, large numbers of people committed to it so that we can properly support the...
QUESTION: Admiral, could you describe the damage on the ship in a little more detail, beyond what's on the waterline, how many compartments were flooded, where the fires...
CLARK: Well, I can't give you -- I can give you a little information. I said the main areas are the one engine room and one auxiliary engineering space. That is the space that would hold pumps and various kind of valves for the control of fluids and so forth around the ship.
The spaces adjacent to that space have also been affected, but I don't know to the extent, and that includes I understand the messing and berthing -- messing area where the crew eats and a living space.
But at this point in time, there are at an evolution with a maximum number of people assigned to operating stations. When you're coming in -- and we call it the special sea-in-anchor evolution -- and during this period of time, there are a large number of people on the fo'c'sle and on the fantail handling the lines. You've got people in every location in the ship. They have the maximum number of people required to execute this kind of evolution. This is a varsity event when you're mooring the ship.
So that's the posture the ship was in, and I just don't have any other detail that I can share with you at this time.
QUESTION: There's no way this could be anticipated or prevented? At least...
CLARK: Well, what I'm telling you, is that because force -- the secretary has made it real clear to us in uniform where force protection stands on the priority list. And that is the reason that the kind of -- the extent of events occurs before they go into a port like they did here, as I described to you, specific plans, force protection plans, for entry into this specific port.
I can tell you, when I came in the Navy, we never, ever did things like this. This is the kind of -- this is the kind of steps that we're taking now to protect our people.
So my view is, and the scenario that I've described to you is, that it would be extraordinarily difficult to have ever observed in time to do anything about this kind of situation and to have stopped it.
QUESTION: What are you doing now to make sure this doesn't happen? Now that you know this is a possibility, what do you do now?
CLARK: The investigation will give us all of the details into this, and then we will evaluate those findings. And we will come to judgments about any steps that we can take to mitigate the risk.
But I have to say, you know, let's understand 101 ships around the world today. And we do not live in a low-threat environment around the whole world. And so risk does exist, and we will never be able to take steps to eliminate all risk.
I make this point to say that this is about the young men and women who serve our country. And we can't lose sight of this. They are -- their service involves some risk. And it's part of their service that they go to the four corners of this Earth and represent this nation and our interests.
And so, I won't prejudge what those findings might be. But I can assure you that an event like this will not occur without receiving the attention of the highest levels of leadership in our department, and that includes myself.
QUESTION: At this point, is there a risk of the ship being lost completely, as a result of the damage?
CLARK: I've described the events to you the best way I know how. The captain...
QUESTION: Somebody used the phrase, "fighting for the life of his ship."
CLARK: I said, "fighting for their ship." And I was careful in the way I said that. I don't want to give the impression -- and if I did, I'm glad you asked the question. They're fighting for their ship.
And I make that point, because look at this hole. See, the water is still free-flowing here, so the flooding challenge is not over. They have it under control, all right. The shipping is listing, by last report, four degrees, which is not a significant indication of progressive damage.
And so based on the information now, I see no such threat. They are doing a great job containing the damage.
QUESTION: Admiral how long does it take for the USS Cole to refuel? Was this a four-hour operation, six-hour, what was sort of the window of opportunity?
CLARK: I can't really answer. I don't know what her fuel load was. Nominally, you pull into a port, though, like this, and you look at an hour or so to get tied up and get all the lines over. And then, maybe two to three hours to execute a fueling evolution. But that's soft, because I don't know how much fuel she needed.
LOU WATERS, CNN ANCHOR: Secretary of defense and the chief of naval operations, briefing reporters at the Pentagon about the attack on the USS Cole in the port of Aden in Yemen. The latest information from the ship, as we just heard the admiral say, 250 shipmates battling for their ship, meaning they are working the damage -- and the captain reporting everything is under control, except there is damage and there is flooding. And that's what they're working on.
The power has been restored. Latest information from the captain: five dead now -- five being reported dead -- 35 injured, 12 still reported missing. As far as the wounded, a United States aircraft with a surgeon aboard is in Yemen. Right behind it is a larger medical team, with more surgeons and more medical personnel -- and a medivac plane behind that to take care of the injured U.S. sailors, who are now in hospitals in Yemen -- notification of families still not complete -- and the admiral asking for restraint on the part of reporters insisting on knowing more about that, until that operation is complete.
Two U.S. ships are also on their way, 300 miles now from Yemen. They should arrive some time tomorrow. As far as the Iraqi troop movements are concerned, the secretary of defense said: We are watching, but we have not seen anything yet that Saddam -- that gives us an indication that Saddam Hussein is planning to cause trouble.
As far as the boat that was alongside the ship, and what was aboard it, what kind of explosives, the Pentagon still not willing to call this a terrorist act, although the chief of naval operations did say there is no reason to believe that it was anything but a terrorist attack.
We are continuing to follow the story in Yemen and in the Middle East.
TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com
|Back to the top||
© 2001 Cable News Network. All Rights Reserved.|
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.